Use cases
How CLEARSKY fits
your work.
Investigation work has different shapes. The platform underneath stays the same. Below is how CLEARSKY maps to four common operating contexts: solicitors and litigation support, insurance investigation, corporate security, and investigations consultancies. Same ontology, same audit log, same public verifier. Different framing.
-
01 · Solicitors & litigation support
Evidence that has to hold up under disclosure. Signed dossiers verifiable by opposing counsel without a CLEARSKY account. Audit log append-only, redaction reasoning per field.
-
02 · Insurance investigation
Claims fraud, large-loss, due diligence on counterparties. Proportionality gate documents the lawful basis on every sensitive collection. Receipt of Evidence handles subject access without a separate workflow.
-
03 · Corporate security
Threat intelligence, executive protection, incident response. Tier-respect by construction: above-tier signals do not bleed into lower-clearance reports. CRDT collaboration on the shared knowledge graph.
-
04 · Investigations consultancies
Private investigators, OSINT firms, missing persons charities. 64+ pre-wired UK and IE sources. Dossier signing turns the output into something a client can verify without further tooling.
Not on this list?
Government, journalism, academia, and more.
CLEARSKY is built around an ontology and an intelligence cycle, not a vertical. If you are running an investigation that needs evidence to hold up downstream, the platform applies. Talk to us about your operating context.